We support the education sector
in evidence-based,
quality assurance review
Our Mission
Our Mission
Our mission is to support, connect and advance education institutions by creating a sustainable, efficient, and cost-effective evidence-based review management system with services to support quality assurance
Our mission is to support, connect and advance education institutions by creating a sustainable, efficient, and cost-effective evidence-based review management system with services to support quality assurance
Peer Review Portal is referred to in the TEQSA guidance note on external referencing as an online support mechanism which can be used by individuals, education providers, industry, networks and professional associations in meeting national and international standards in external peer review. The guide references the Portal as an optional support mechanism that higher education providers can use for external referencing activity and reporting.
Peer Review Portal is referred to in the TEQSA guidance note on external referencing as an online support mechanism which can be used by individuals, education providers, industry, networks and professional associations in meeting national and international standards in external peer review. The guide references the Portal as an optional support mechanism that higher education providers can use for external referencing activity and reporting.
Guidance Note: ELICOS Direct Entry Version 2, 5 June 2019
Guidance Note: External Referencing (including Benchmarking) Version 2.5, 16 April 2019
Support
Support
Connect
Connect
Advance
Advance
Four Scenarios for using the Peer Review Portal
Four Scenarios for using the Peer Review Portal
Cost benefits of using the Peer Review Portal
Cost benefits of using the Peer Review Portal
The cost benefits of using the Peer Review Portal include:
The cost benefits of using the Peer Review Portal include:
* No annual subscription fees, works on a user pays system at $90+GST per review project
* No annual subscription fees, works on a user pays system at $90+GST per review project
* It significantly reduces current costs in quality assurance
* It significantly reduces current costs in quality assurance
* There are no infrastructure costs or redevelopment costs
* There are no infrastructure costs or redevelopment costs
*Automatic review management system in the cloud
*Automatic review management system in the cloud
* Data confidentiality and security
* Data confidentiality and security
* Ease of use and virtual access
* Ease of use and virtual access
*No duplication of effort creates much greater efficiencies in time
*No duplication of effort creates much greater efficiencies in time
* Customised templates
* Customised templates
* Connectivity with teams, networks and other online systems (including regulatory/accrediting bodies)
* Connectivity with teams, networks and other online systems (including regulatory/accrediting bodies)
* Automatic reporting and calibration
* Automatic reporting and calibration
* Efficient use of resources both internal and external
* Efficient use of resources both internal and external
* Can include consultants and external experts
* Can include consultants and external experts
* Can be used for professional development
* Can be used for professional development
Consider these costs and these benefits with your own institutional practice and costs for all types of course accreditation/reviews (including time taken to complete reviews, administration, reporting and consultancy costs )
Consider these costs and these benefits with your own institutional practice and costs for all types of course accreditation/reviews (including time taken to complete reviews, administration, reporting and consultancy costs )
Contact: info@peerreivewportal.com for more information
Contact: info@peerreivewportal.com for more information
The process for setting up a cloud-based review management system is very simple:
The process for setting up a cloud-based review management system is very simple:
1. Each individual needs to log onto the Portal and set up their account and add their institution
1. Each individual needs to log onto the Portal and set up their account and add their institution
2. An institution contacts info@peerreviewportal.com to set up institutional coordinator/coordinators to set up an institution management system which can monitor all reviews across the institution
2. An institution contacts info@peerreviewportal.com to set up institutional coordinator/coordinators to set up an institution management system which can monitor all reviews across the institution
3. Institution coordinator/faculty coordinator can create/save review template/s
3. Institution coordinator/faculty coordinator can create/save review template/s
4. Reviews are paid by credit card. Institutions can pay for bulk credits and all reviews can be managed by institution coordinator/s or faculty coordinators
4. Reviews are paid by credit card. Institutions can pay for bulk credits and all reviews can be managed by institution coordinator/s or faculty coordinators
5. Evidence-based reporting, including quantitative and qualitative results
5. Evidence-based reporting, including quantitative and qualitative results
6. Monitor, calibrate and report actions from all reviews for institution/faculty reporting and committees
6. Monitor, calibrate and report actions from all reviews for institution/faculty reporting and committees
Online review process with three simple steps
Online review process with three simple steps
1. UPLOAD
1. UPLOAD
Applicant/institution uploads evidence for review
Applicant/institution uploads evidence for review
Upload questionnaire for review
Upload questionnaire for review
2. REVIEW
2. REVIEW
Add reviewers, collaborators & chair
Add reviewers, collaborators & chair
3. RESULTS
3. RESULTS
Online Panel: Chair and panel calibrate & report results
Online Panel: Chair and panel calibrate & report results
Optional Benefit
Optional Benefit
Professional development workshops
Professional development workshops
Reviews can be used for professional development purposes and online communities of practices.
Reviews can be used for professional development purposes and online communities of practices.
All de-identified qualitative and quantitative data and comments can be used as part of a professional learning workshop
All de-identified qualitative and quantitative data and comments can be used as part of a professional learning workshop
SIX REVIEW TYPES ARE AVAILABLE
SIX REVIEW TYPES ARE AVAILABLE
MODERATION-INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL
MODERATION-INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL
Port Arthur, Tasmania
Port Arthur, Tasmania